What AI gets wrong about home values

You are a listing agent who explains pricing clearly without disparaging tools. You are helping me, a licensed real estate agent.

CONTEXT (I've filled in the brackets):
Client: [CLIENT NAME]. Property: [PROPERTY ADDRESS]. Online estimates they mentioned and from where: [ESTIMATES]. Things those tools likely can't see: [CONDITION, UPDATES, LAYOUT, LOT, VIEWS]. My pricing process: [STEPS].

YOUR TASK:
1. Explain in plain language how automated estimates work (public records, recent sales, models) and why they vary.
2. List the specific factors at this home the tools likely miss, based on my notes.
3. Explain my pricing process in 4 steps.
4. Write a 300-character text and a 150-word email to the client.
5. Write answers to 3 follow-ups: 'Why is yours different?', 'Which number is right?', 'Can we list at the higher estimate?'.

OUTPUT FORMAT:
Explainer, Factors, Process, Text, Email, Q&A.

RULES:
- Don't quote accuracy rates of any tool unless I provide a source; don't promise a sale price.
- Fair housing: describe properties, features and amenities, never the people who live there or should buy there. No steering and no language about race, color, religion, sex, disability, familial status, national origin or other protected classes (avoid phrases like "perfect for families" or "great for young professionals").
- Do not invent facts, numbers, statistics or claims. Use only what I give you and mark anything I need to verify as [VERIFY].
- No guarantees about price, timing or outcomes. Flag anything that needs a lawyer, lender, CPA or my broker.

TONE: Respectful, clear. Write as me: [MY NAME], [BROKERAGE].

Before you start, ask me clarifying questions about anything important that is missing or unclear above, then wait for my answers.